4.19.2006

This is a remote viewing of the upcoming earthquake that will affect the San Francisco Bay Area

The quake will happen at 4:06 AM on a Thursday of the year 2006, and will be a magnitude of 8.2.  There will be several small earthquakes starting 4 days before the main event.  The first will be a 3.9, when this happens, there will be 4 days until the event.  Two days prior to the main quake, a 4.1 earthquake will be recorded.   Other details are drawn above, but I do not know what they mean.

WARNING: EVENT #4 HAS HAPPENED RIGHT ON TIME...THIS IS EVENT #5

RELATED DREAMS: DD3835

Other Earthquake Links on this site:

66 DAYS  |  The Great San Francisco Earthquake of 2006 | Ring of Fire Map

RELATED DREAMS:  INDIA QUAKE  66 DAYS  SAN FRANCISCO  DD 1524  DD 2893  DD 3352  DD 3458  DD 3655  DD 3713  DD 4148  DD 4204

BREAKING NEWS: OTHERS MIGHT HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON THIS EVENT, PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR DETAILS

4.22.2006

Hello Brian,

Yesterday was the last day of the 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference held in San Francisco, and I heard on the news they have found a new earthquake fault not previously known about.  Also there was an article on  4/17/06 at BBC news.com UK version that had startling news of the effects of a quake scenario if it happened at San Juan Batista in Central California.  You can read the whole article at www.crystalinks.com ,then scroll down to the article.  Just thought you may want to pass this on to your readers.  I think in your drawing when you wrote San Juan, you really meant San Juan Batista, and it makes perfect sense.

Sincere Regards,

Mark & Lisa Poe

reply

Hi, thanks and will post this.

Brian

5.11.2006

Hi again,

I've been staring at your drawings from this RV.

I suspect you have most of this down except maybe the map. I note that Thursday 4:06 am *may* be Thursday 9:06 am. It's sort of in between what you usually draw as a four and a nine. So alertness 5 hours later than 4:06 am may be appropriate. Might be a good day to be late for work :-)

On the first drawing, I think it the "San Juan" indicates that the quake at least involves San Juan Bautista. I think the way it is involved is that it will mark the southern end of the slip. I don't think it will be the epicenter.

San Juan Bautista to Eureka, where the San Andreas veers out to sea, is 300 miles. That I believe, is the length of the strike slip, from Eureka all the way down to San Juan Batista. That is a very lengthy slip. The 1906 quake ran from Cape Mendocino down to San Juan Bautista. The lateral movement of the ground was up to 21 feet in places.

Speaking of the 1906 quake, it was an 8.3 and was centered offshore just west of San Francisco. That is where the main San Andreas fault runs, as can be seen on the attached map of earthquakes and faultlines in the SF area (the ones to the east are branches of the Hayward fault).

Your RV'ing points to exactly the same place. In the first drawing you have "12 miles" and a left arrow. In the second you show what appears to be the SF peninsula, the Golden Gate Bridge, and the  peninsula to the north of the Golden Gate Bridge. 12 miles to the west of the Golden Gate Bridge, give or take a mile, lies the San Andreas fault. You have indicated "breaks here" on your drawing. I conclude, prior to the evidence appearing, that the epicenter of your 8.2 quake will be right where it was in 1906. It will slip along the fault for a total of 300 miles.

Massive amounts of energy will be loaded at the south end of the slip zone and down for the 7.9 in LA. - the epicenter for which I would expect to see somewhere between Palmdale and San Bernardino, where the San Andreas runs north of the Transverse Range north of the major metropolitan areas. From there it could slip toward the Salton Sea past Palm Springs, or slip south on the San Jacinto fault. Toward the Salton Sea is traditional thinking for the main "highway" of the San Andreas, but energy is likely also to be released southward on the San Jacinto fault with a quake of this magnitude.

Here is a good article on what might be expected of an 8.2 centered just off the coast of San Francisco, right where the 1906 quake was:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0413_060413_earthquake.html

I hope this does not come to pass. LA could be hit nearly as hard if energy transfers south from the Transverse Range along any number of fault lines.

Best
Scott

reply

Hi, thanks, when I do a RV I basically close my eyes and slow down my mind...then I start to see things...and all I do is try and draw what I see...it's really that simple...and most of the time, I have no idea what I'm drawing.  Will post your information in hopes that it may help others.

Thanks.

Brian