Hi Brian 

Have you seen this?? The Artikel is pubblisied Today in Correio da Manha!!!

 In a Dream you have mentioned Rocha......this City Name is Porches!!

 The Taxi Driver who claim Madeleine was in her Taxi, mentioned a Blu Jeep.

 In this cause in the "Tentativa de rapto de jovem de 15 anos" the Girl say that the Car was a Jeep Black and the Numberplate was from Gran-Britain or Belgium!!!!

Hi Brian

           i just wanted to see that i think the story's that are all coming out now seem to be on purpose.

I think the lawyer is a friend of the Portuguese police and he is only searching the reservoir for Madeleine's body to try convince people she is dead.

As all missing children are important then why is the lawyer spending his own money searching a reservoir for Madeleine when there has been many missing children from Portugal and he has not spent 1 penny on them.

I have heard the story's that the lawyer said he is basing his evidence that Madeleine is in the reservoir because he had a dream,first he said he had been told she was there by underworld criminals now he said it was because he had a dream,maybe he has been getting quizzed on who the supposed underworld criminals are.

I have a feeling that because they said the mud at the bottom of the reservoir is 4 feet deep,i think the PJ will plant a bit of clothing from Madeleine in the reservoir so that they can say that her body must of sunk but they found her clothing and make out she is there but will not be able to find her,well if they can find a white sock then if she was there then i think they would be able to find her.

The PJ seem to be trying very hard to manipulate our minds into thinking Madeleine is dead when we all know it is the PJ and Murat and malinka who is involved.

The other point about Murat finding a tracking device under his car,well i think that is just another distraction by the police,Who would put a such a device under his car,i mean the police are protecting Murat so it would not be them,and Metodo 3 would not risk something so silly as it is illegal and they would not risk there business.

I think it was all suppose to come out on purpose so the PJ can say well that proves Murat has been nowhere unusual,just like a staged set up.It will prob come out that the PJ admit it was them who put it there and they did it to prove that Murat is Innocent.

Oh and the idiot who is written the book about Madeleine,well has the PJ no shame,its as if they have no morals and heart.He is under investigation himself and he is making money out of an investigation,i thought this wasn't allowed.

Why cant the Mcanns try to sue this PJ for the book as is that not suggesting that they killed Madeleine just like the Sun Paper made out.

I have always believed you have been right with this case and i hope that the people from haunting evidence can make a difference as i believe in their gift as well.

 All my love Jennifer *** xx

reply

Hi, will post this.

http://www.champnews.com:80/html/newsstory.asp?id=6568

reply

Thanks Liz, link posted.

Brian

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1309905,00.html 

Brian I thought you ,might want to see this...... at least the Madeleine fund should now be able to go on and hopefully get someone serious involved to bring that little treasure home where she belongs!!!! Surely there must be someone better than Methodo 3???!!!!

Wishing you and yours a very happy Easter.......

Susanne

reply

Hi Susan, lets hope so and happy Easter too.

Brian

Second Life Paedophile Warning 05/03/08

Hi Brian,

    This is on Sky news site tonight, in one of the pages,at the beggining, there was someone who reported that on the Romigen website, there was a reference to Madeleine, with the words,"No Second life", or something along those lines.This is a piece about paedophiles, activly using the site to act out their fantasies... take a look please.

Best wishes to you and the familly,

Congrats on getting the job too ; )

Best wishes , God Bless

Cy uk

reply

Thank you and will post this.

Brian

RE: Morocco pictures

Just to remind everyone of a few things as you/we did a lot of posting on this subject when it first hit the papers..To recap I think you/we (readers)  concluded that...

1.  The 1st photo was either real / or "photoshopped" and the 2nd photo was 'staged' to look like the first picture (taken 1 month later).   

An easy way to check this idea out,  is to play the 'spot the difference' game.   

1. detail of the hat (colours of pom poms on hat 1 vs and colour orders of the pom poms in hat 2!

2. Apron stripes on 'lady 1' is are different vs lady 2 i.e. wider vs thinner stripes!  

NOte: This is traditional dress - so it means two entirely different Moroccan women (or less likely, the same woman)  - happens to have two hats, two aprons and is walking down the same dirt track one month later??  Come on guys, there is something strange about this' set up'.

What is also suspect about the first photo does indeed look like MM, but an image of her when she was much younger.  

Also, someone said something about her legs (in photo 1) can't be seen wrapped around waist or dangling down which validates the theory that the head was photoshoped on - possibly this person was carrying a baby on back but the head was replaced with an out of date photo of MM?

So in other words, the Morocco picture no 1 was probably photoshopped and set up to get everyone searching in morroco as a 'smoke screen' at the time when we were still looking for her.   

The second photo was created to 'prove' it wasn't her after-all, but in effect neither picture is real.   

Why the press were so manipulating makes one wonder who is powering this MM 'machine'.  I guess just Murdoch (masonic) journalistic manipulation!!??

My reason for going over this is please, let us not waste time discussing what was obviously a distraction tactic..and refocus on what we DO have. 

I want to remind everyone to ignore what the press say and if you are on brians site and respect him then really don't get distracted and perhaps focus more on the unsolved things within the dreams for this case by revisiting early pages of this case...?

The fact that recent names of certain PJ that have come up are " luis "and "ricado" for instance seems to point towards your scary dd where you see this 'owl' type monster and written you say something like "luis, carlos ricardo, stop the pain..!  "

Makes me wonder more and more about people extending from Admarli's buddies and this author of book (ex PJ Paulo Cristovao ) struck me yesterday because  a few months back I had already discovered him when researching joana cipriano case after the RV's you did for her and had a feeling something was a bit odd about the fact he had written a 'novel' on the cipriano case??

I believe the real people involved are the PJ (covering up) particularly the four PJ that are standing trial for bad treatment of Leonore Cipriano.   The church also for covering up because they know about this activity presumably -  of child trafficking../abuse at very least.  And dare i add that there is a possibility that the church (some members that is)  are somehow involved more directly.   Feels like a pact of silence has been made.  That the undertones  have for some reason turned  political?

Funnily enough i think the public generally can feel that we are being hoodwinked and are suspicious because our gut says something is not quite natural about this case. That there has been some gagging orders from above, we know it, we feel it.

Want to point out that the journalist Vanessa... from daily mail UK newspaper, was the same journalist that dared to write the article about the casa pia scandal being the backcloth to this case... maybe she is equally 'onto something' by highlighting the Paulo Cristovao angle....??

Re: Murat- Now this is so story has become so  "out of hand" i feel murat is between and hard rock and a place - and by proxy beomce canon fodder so to speak.  Although your dd's point to him, as the source, other rv's indicate that  he can't be a lone operator!?   He would have been 'slung up' way more swiftly if he had been just that.  The fact we have that early photograph of him joking about with a large crowd of PJ's - this  clearly shows the PJ were his  'buddies'.  Legally in spain one can be made an aguido, but one can also request to be made an aguido so we will never know who asked for his status.  What we do know is this identity or rater status,  immediately protects a person from being asked questions... a bit like i won't talk till i have a lawyer line...

Brian you had an early DD or RV that said " he " (murat we presumed) had spoken to the client a day after abduction? 

So let us assume there was a 'client' who commissioned her abduction?  

We presume Murat was in deep but I actually believe it works in same way that someone wants to score drugs.  You want say x drug and you know someone who knows someone who can get it from someone who knows someone etc... you as the client have no idea what it took to get that drug..

Therefore we have to in fact work backwards for a minute to understand that quite possibly -  murat was the last in the chain not the first... i.e someone wants a child - they find via via via this contact someone who can 'organise' the abduction.  i.e. the client went to a professional, the professional may or may not know who is doing the job, all they care is that what they have ordered and paid for has achieved the 'goal'.  In terms of the RV that said this had been done 39 times, i see this as a trading thing. i.e. there is someone who is good at abductions who has abducted children some 39 times for different clients with different needs.  That could be a p-file, but equally it could be a wealthy childless couple, or a person wanting to 'blackmail' the parents.  No one ever ask the client why they want this child, they just take the orders and recieve the cash for the job.

By saying this i say that murat had no idea who was on top of his 'pyramid' when he agreed to this.  He presumed it was the typical p-file abduction but did not appreciate the political or high profile implications of this

Who is the end client?

Either the belgian ring (hope not) / or more likely someone in the political arena, i.e. it was political maneuver, engineered by someone who happens to also be a mason of some sort - this itself is not important - but given the matthew james references to 'chequer board' halls etc. i presume he means this person also just happens to be a freemason of some sort..and that being a member has enabled this 'client' to keep this secret...

i.e. by proxy, by being a kind of mason means one is able to  operates above the law.  This is fact whether we like it or not

To end on positive note - I strongly believe MM safe, unquestionably, she must be  missing her parents but she is i believe alive...

Best wishes, CL

reply

Hi again...the second photo was taken to make her look like she did then in the first photo, and I'm not sure why that was not explained when the reporter 'found her'.

When I first saw the photo I thought it looked like Madeleine, and I'm sure many people did...if it's proven it was Photoshop enhanced, and if a news agency like Express Newspapers or Exposay were lets say 'caught' doing this...then they might have gotten into trouble.

That's assuming that this report below is not true...I also realize that most likely this is not case related, but there is always a chance some detail could help.

*****